They said that my answers were inconsistent. They said that it doesn't make sense why it was okay to save three lives in one scenario while not in the other one.
I think their results were pretty accurate. They said that i believed killing all the children was right cause she was sparring them of the pain they would have received when they were going to be killed. Her doing this did not benefit herself but was in the interest of the kids. It was selfless. While they said my other two scenarios contradicted each other which i guess that is true. The two other scenarios were similar yet my answers were different. I think i said it was wrong to kill the guy in the life boat cause i view eating people as morally wrong and i feel that they could have at least let him die instead, even if his blood would be in better condition.
No comments:
Post a Comment